A service of the CrimRxiv Consortium Visit CrimRxiv →

Self-assessment

Is UX research right for you?

18 questions across 5 sub-dimensions. About four minutes. Your answers stay in your browser.

  1. 1. I can plan a small interview study (about 8 people) and have a written summary within two weeks.

    Rate from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

  2. 2. I'm comfortable watching someone use software and asking them to narrate what they're thinking.

    Rate from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

  3. 3. I can write a one-page research plan with clear questions, methods, and the decisions it will inform.

    Rate from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

  4. 4. I can analyze a mix of qualitative and quantitative data and resist over-interpreting small samples.

    Rate from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

  5. 5. I'm comfortable acting on an 80%-confident finding when the decision can be reversed later.

    Rate from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

  6. 6. I can change my study mid-way when the question I'm trying to answer shifts.

    Rate from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

  7. 7. I'd rather deliver a useful answer in two weeks than a perfect one in two months.

    Rate from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

  8. 8. I can explain how a research finding should change what gets built, measured, or shown on screen.

    Rate from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

  9. 9. I can read software documents, design mockups, and usage dashboards without getting lost.

    Rate from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

  10. 10. I can recognize when research isn't the right tool and suggest a cheaper way to get the answer.

    Rate from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

  11. 11. I think about the specific person trying to get something done — not just populations and average effects.

    Rate from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

  12. 12. I can write a one-page summary that a busy non-academic colleague will actually read.

    Rate from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

  13. 13. I'm comfortable presenting findings to skeptical engineers or executives.

    Rate from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

  14. 14. I can replace academic hedging with plain claims while still being honest about uncertainty.

    Rate from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

  15. 15. I can disagree with a designer or product manager and still get invited to the next meeting.

    Rate from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

  16. 16. I can turn down a research request and offer a useful alternative.

    Rate from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

  17. 17. I can read the politics of a room and adjust how I deliver bad news.

    Rate from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

  18. 18. I'm energized — not drained — by working with non-researchers every day.

    Rate from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree